Afghanistan is one of those cases where security, energy and economic development are so closely inter-related. Without any single link of the chain ensuring political stability, economic prosperity and social security in the country would be highly problematic. At the moment, due to limited energy production capacity the country is not capable of meeting its demand. Luckily for Afghanistan, however, it is surrounded by several states on the North–West willing and capable of supplying electricity, gas and light oil products so that the country could to some extent improve its energy security. Experts and decision makers promoting regional energy projects to ensure greater energy security in the country emphasize the importance of such initiatives without which security and economic prosperity would not be achieved. Yet not everyone is that optimistic about the regional-level energy projects and put them in the category of myths and dreams. One of the major challenges remains limited financial capabilities of Afghanistan itself and due to high security risks lack of interest from other potential investors. Does it imply, however, that initiatives to establish major regional energy infrastructures should be abandoned? The answer is most likely no! And there is an actor willing to give these projects new impetus.
Afghan authorities often emphasize the importance of energy for the economic development of the country. As was mentioned in the Afghanistan National Development Strategy, for instance, “Energy is [Afghanistan’s] top economic development priority” and “[is] the motor that powers [Afghanistan’s] growth.” Over a 30-year long ongoing conflict in Afghanistan seriously limited country’s ability to develop its energy potential as well as establishing a country-wide infrastructure to ensure distant population spots connected to the integrated power transmission and gas pipeline systems. That is why, for the moment, to ensure greater energy security Afghanistan has to rely on energy supplies from abroad.
There are smaller energy infrastructure connecting Central Asian electric power producers and Afghanistan. Three interconnected countries: Uzbekistan–Afghanistan – existing 220 kV 2 circuits and one 110 kV line; Tajikistan–Afghanistan – existing 220 kV 2 circuits and one 110 kV line; Turkmenistan–Afghanistan – 110 kV line. Between 2007 and 2009, Turkmenistan exported electricity to Tajikistan in an amount of 1 billion kWh annually, but stopped due to Uzbekistan’s withdrawal from the CAPS.  Turkmenistan is building a 500 kV electric power transmission line to move electricity from Mary TPP to Afghanistan, which was initially planned to be constructed with the capacity of 220 kV.
There are also large energy projects designed to meet energy needs of Afghanistan with Central Asian energy supplies. The idea to build the Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India pipeline with the capacity to transport 33 billion m3 first emerged in the middle of 1990s. While the Asian Development Bank has carried out feasibility study of the project and found it economically viable and showed even the willingness to financially support the construction of the TAPI pipeline, no party has taken a responsibility to cover or significantly contribute to the construction of the pipeline with the total cost of US$7.6–10 billion. At the same time, President of Turkmenistan Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov during his speech at the VI International Gas Congress on May 19, 2015 highlighted that he truly believes in the successful implementation of the TAPI project. And, while some argue that no progress has been achieved so far, Turkmen authorities have recently announced that the construction process has been started on their side.
Another major regional-level energy project is CASAREM, which is projected to move the extra-generated electricity from Central Asian upstream countries to South Asian energy markets. As a first phase of the initiative, it was decided to concentrate on CASA–1000 transmission lines to transit 1,300 MW of electricity. At 1,222 km long, running through Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan (PS Datka (Kyrgyzstan) – PS Khujant (Tajikistan) – Rogun HPP (Tajikistan) – Kabul – Peshawar), the line includes: 500 kV DC line 750 km long through Tajikistan (117 km) – Afghanistan (562 km) – Pakistan (71 km); 500 kV AC line through Kyrgyzstan (substation Datka, 452 km) – Tajikistan (PS Khujant, 20 km). With a total length of 472 km, CASA-1000 is supposed to link regional electricity producers with southern energy markets. Despite various concerns over the project, for the most part country-wide electric power transmission lines in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan have already been constructed, thus making the process to establish CASA-1000 considerably easy.
The government of Afghanistan has adopted a National Energy Supply Program 2030, which focuses on energy supply, transmission and distribution, energy efficiency, reinforcing institutions and private sector participation. Within the framework of this program authorities plan to increase electrification rate from 30 percent to 83 percent through an integrated power system, increase domestic power production capacity almost 3 folds and, of course, power exchange options. These goals can only be achieved with the support of outside donors. High-level security risks are important factors pushing many investors away from the regional-level energy projects. However, there are certain organizations supporting projects that may not be attractive to others. The Asian Development Bank is Afghanistan’s largest development partner in the energy sector the overall grant assistance of which is about US$ 2.2 billion. The Asian Development Bank, for instance, has agreed to provide US$ 1.2 billion of grants for the implementation of energy projects in Afghanistan in between 2015 and 2025 with the purpose to: (a) boost the energy supplies; (b) improve power sector efficiency; and, (c) promote regional trade with a particular focus on the Central Asian gas and electric power supplies.
There is indeed a high security risk in regards to stable functioning of energy transporting infrastructures from Central Asia to Afghanistan. Pipeline infrastructure and electric power transmission lines often run over long distances through sparsely populated and therefore only poorly guarded territory. Once damage has been done, it often takes time until the status quo is restored. A recent Taliban attack on electric power transmission line connecting Uzbekistan and Kabul is a clear example showing the seriousness of the threat. At the same time attacks on the smaller electric power transmission lines shows that not only large energy projects but also local energy infrastructure can be and is a target for insurgent groups. While abandoning risky energy projects in Afghanistan is what some decision makers and experts insist on, this will not make a big difference as in an environment of insecurity every project, small or big, is under threat. In this regard, instead of abandoning or postponing projects parties should search for alternative on how to provide higher security for the energy infrastructure.
 Katerina Oskarsson, “Energy–Development–Security Nexus in Afghanistan,” Journal of Energy Security, November 20, 2012,
 Abdul Razique Samadi, “Energy Consumption and Available Energy Resources in Afghanistan,” n.d.
 “Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India [TAPI] Pipeline.”
 Danila Bochkarev, “Another Pipe Dream?” Natural Gas Europe, March 25, 2015, accessed May 15, 2015, http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/another-pipe-dream-22882.
 “Obespechenie Globalnoy Energobezopasnosti–Faktor Ustoychivogo Razvitiya (Global Energy Security is a Guarantor of Sustainable Development),” Ministry of Oil and Gas Industry and Mineral Resources Journal, May 28, 2015, http://www.oilgas.gov.tm/publikatsii/item/435.
 World Bank, World—Central Asia South Asia Electricity Transmission and Trade Project (CASA 1000) (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012), accessed May 5, 2014, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/06/16435491/world-central….
 World Bank, CASA-1000 Project Risk Assessment (Washington, DC: World Bank, n.d), accessed May 7, 2014, http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/eca/central-asia….
 Energy Supply Improvement Investment Program (RRP AFG 47282-001) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION A. Major Development Partners: Strategic Foci and Key Activities
 “ADB $1.2 Billion Grant to Support Afghanistan’s Energy Security,” Asian Development Bank, December 7, 2015,
 Habib Rahman Sherzai, “Taliban attack snaps power supply to Kabul from Uzbekistan,” Pajhwok Afghan News, January 27, 2016 http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2016/01/27/taliban-attack-snaps-power-supply-k…
*Published in the March 2016 No. 3 issue of the “Asya Avrupa: Haber-Yorum” journal.
Note: The views expressed in this blog are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the Institute’s editorial policy.
Farkhod Aminjonov is an expert on energy security with a particular focus on Central Asia and the broader Eurasian region. He holds a Ph.D. in global governance from the Balsillie School of International Affairs (offered jointly by the Center of International Governance Innovation, Wilfrid Laurier University and the University of Waterloo), Waterloo, Canada. In 2015, Farkhod Aminjonov successfully defended his Ph.D dissertation titled “Security of the Central Asian Energy System Through Regional-Level Energy Governance Innovations.” Dr. Aminjonov received his M.A in international area studies